How Samuel Hopkins
Relates to the
Heresy Of Decisional Regeneration
Samuel Hopkins (1721-1803) |
*CONSECUTIONAL: Consecutional means that Saving Faith is the Consequence of Saving Grace. For The New Light Calvinist, this also means Saving Repentance and Saving Faith are the result of regeneration and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God". Saving grace is the cause of saving faith... anything other than consecutional faith is not saving faith.
The theological basis for New Light Calvinist ministers
asking seekers to make an immediate Decision for Christ
1) ELECTION |
1) THE GOOD OF THE UNIVERSE AS A WHOLE IS THE REASON GOD ELECTS CERTAIN PEOPLE TO SALVATION. "This is universal benevolence; disinterested, unlimited, infinite goodness, which has the highest possible good of being in general for its object, that is, infinite good; which must infallibly take place, and be enjoyed forever. |
An explanation for modern Christians who think election, or predestination is either determined by God's foreknowledge or God's mysterious decree...
Most Calvinists believe God determined election for reasons known only to Him, those to whom he would apply irresistible grace and be saved. Most Aminians believe God determined election by foreknowledge of who would not resist His grace and be saved.
The New Light Calvinist view of election went further into why God elects some to heaven and some to hell. When Hopkins says God ordains "the highest possible good of being for its object", he is not referring just to individuals, but to all of creation. When Paul and Silas sang songs in the dungeon, they knew they were part of God's bigger plan to bring salvation to the world. If they had died in prison, it would have been God's decree "which has the highest possible good of
being in general for its object, that is, infinite good".
2) GOD DECREES - THAT'S HOW HE KNOWS THE FUTURE |
2) EVERYTHING IS DECREED BY GOD'S ETERNAL PURPOSE - ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY. |
An explanation for modern Christians who think this sounds like fatalism...
Fatalism is "the view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do. Included in this is that man has no power to influence the future, or indeed, his own actions.
Second generation New Light Calvinist theology did not advocate fatalism, but predeterminism. God predetermined everything before he created the universe. This does not affect man's free will in the least. Think of the future as already having happened for God, and it's like a completed film, "in the can". Since only God can see the film, it does not affect the actors in the least bit who are yet to play their parts.
3) FORKNOWLEDGE AND DECREES ARE EQUALLY PROBLEMATIC |
3) IF NEW LIGHT CALVINIST PREDETERMINISM IS NOT RECONCILABLE WITH MAN'S FREE WILL AND MORAL CHOICE, SO IS THE ARMINIAN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUMENTAL FAITH |
4) GOD'S SOVEREIGNTY AND MAN'S FREE WILL IS AN ANTINOMY |
4) NEW LIGHT CALVINIST PREDETERMINISM IS AN ANTINOMY WITH MAN'S FREE WILL AND MORAL AGENCY - BUT SINCE IT IS TAUGHT IN THE BIBLE, IT IS WISE NOT TO STRUGGLE WITH IT. |
5) MISUNDERSTANDING OF PREDETERMINISM #1 |
5) SKEPTICS THINK PREDETERMINATION MEANS GOD SAVES PEOPLE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY REPENT AND SUBMIT AND HAVE FAITH |
6) MISUNDERSTANDING OF PREDETERMINISM #2 |
6) SKEPTICS THINK PREDETERMINATION MEANS GOD WILL NOT SAVE PEOPLE ON THE BASIS OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY REPENT AND SUBMIT AND HAVE FAITH |
7) SCRIPTURE SHOWS GOD USES MEANS TO GET ENDS |
7) The doctrine of God's decrees, including the means as well as the end, and connecting one with the other, so as to render the former important and necessary as the latter, as has been now stated and explained, in opposition to the absurd notion of fatality just mentioned, may be illustrated by a piece of history which we have in the Acts of the Apostles. The Apostle Paul being in a terrible storm at sea, and "all hope that they should be saved was taken away” had a revelation from heaven, that not one of them in the ship should lose his life; but they should all get safe to land. Upon which he stood
forth, and declared it unto them, and his atterance that this revealed decree would come to pass. Thus Paul and his company were elected to be saved from the danger |
8) GOD AND MAN BOTH INVOLVED IN HARDENING HEART |
8) Whenever God hardens the heart, and closes the eyes of men, they harden their own hearts, and shut their own eyes, the one being necessarily implied and involved in the other, so that when it is expressly said that God hardens the heart of any man, or hath given him eyes that he should not see, it is as really asserted, that the man himself hardens his own heart, and closes his own eyes, as the latter is necessarily implied, it being the very thing expressly said to be produced as the effect of the divine agency. Therefore when Isaiah speaks of God as hardening men's hearts, and shutting their eyes, he equally asserts that these men harden their own hearts, and close their own eyes; and may justly, and with the greatest propriety be quoted, as asserting both of them, or either the one, or the other. |
9) GOD AND MAN BOTH INVOLVED IN MAKING A NEW HEART |
9) Whenever and wherever God gives a new heart, the man makes himself a new heart, in that agency and those exercises, in
which a new heart consists. He renews and cleanses his own heart, and circumcises it, by turning from sin to
God; hating sin and loving God, and in all that agency, |
So this is why New Light Calvinists told seekers to make themselves a new heart. They were not saying anyone can be regenerated if they want - they were saying if God has regenerated you, you will show the fruit. Hopkins continues: "The sinner’s heart cannot be made a clean heart, by the divine agency, in any other way, but by the sinner's cleansing his own heart; because a clean heart consists in those exercises of the man, in which he does cleanse his own heart. It is a contradiction to say, that God has circumcised the heart of a man to love him; and yet the man does not love him, or, which is the same, has not circumcised his own heart to love the Lord: And so of the rest. Therefore when God says, he will give a new heart and put a new spirit within men; it is really asserted that they shall renew their own hearts, in the proper exercises and agency, in which a new heart and new spirit consists; or that they shall walk in his ways. And on the contrary, whenever a man makes him a new heart, and becomes obedient, this implies all that divine agency, by which God gives a new heart: And therefore by asserting the former to exist, the latter is really asserted. If a man purifies himself, and cleanses his own heart, in pure, holy exercises, it is certain that God has created in him a clean, a new heart; and to assert the former or the latter, is really to assert both."
So when Lyman Beecher or Asahel Nettleton or Charles Finney said, "make yourself a new heart", now you know what they meant.